âThe Tashkent Declaration was a reasonable compromise. But in both countries, it was seen as a sellout. Hawks on both sides felt their leaders had given away too much.â â Ramachandra Guha
This chapter examines the 1965 India-Pakistan War in greater detailâits origins, conduct, and consequencesâand the political transitions that followed Shastriâs sudden death, leading to Indira Gandhiâs rise to power.
Pakistanâs military rulers, emboldened by Indiaâs 1962 defeat, believed they could detach Kashmir through a combination of guerrilla warfare and conventional attack. Operation Gibraltar aimed to spark an uprising; Operation Grand Slam would cut off Kashmir from India.
Pakistan believed: (1) Kashmiris would rise against Indian rule; (2) India, still recovering from 1962, could not fight effectively; (3) China might intervene; (4) The US would restrain India. All these assumptions proved wrong.
In August 1965, several thousand Pakistani soldiers in civilian disguise crossed into Kashmir. They were supposed to link up with local insurgents and trigger a general uprising. Instead, Kashmiris reported them to Indian authorities.
The expected uprising never materialized. The infiltrators were hunted down. Pakistanâs assumption that Kashmiris were waiting to be âliberatedâ was exposed as fantasy. The failure prompted Pakistan to escalate.
On September 1, Pakistan launched Operation Grand Slamâan armored thrust toward Akhnoor, threatening to cut off Kashmir. India responded by crossing the international border and attacking toward Lahore and Sialkot.
Timeline:
The war was intense but brief. Major tank battles occurred at Asal Uttar and Chawinda. Air forces clashed over both countries. India had the advantage of interior lines; Pakistanâs two wings (East and West) could not support each other.
Neither side achieved its objectives. Pakistan failed to take Kashmir; India failed to take Lahore. But strategically, Pakistanâs gamble had failed. The status quo was preservedâexactly what Pakistan had tried to change.
The Soviet Union, seeking influence in South Asia, invited both leaders to Tashkent. Prime Minister Shastri and President Ayub Khan signed an agreement on January 10, 1966, restoring the status quo ante and committing to peaceful resolution of disputes.
Hours after signing the Tashkent Declaration, Shastri died of a heart attack. His deathâin a foreign country, immediately after a major diplomatic eventâsparked conspiracy theories that persist today.
Was Shastri poisoned? There is no credible evidence, and the most likely cause remains a heart attack under extreme stress. But the questions have never been fully resolved, and his family has demanded reinvestigation.
India again faced the succession question. The Syndicate, learning from 1964, wanted a more pliable candidate. They chose Indira GandhiâNehruâs daughter but seemingly without independent power base.
Kamaraj and the Syndicate believed Indira would be dependent on them. She was relatively inexperienced, had no faction of her own, and seemed temperamentally unsuited for political combat. They would soon discover their error.
Indira Gandhi was sworn in on January 24, 1966. She inherited a country still dealing with warâs aftermath, food crisis, and economic difficulties. Her first years were marked by dependence on the Syndicateâbut she was already planning her breakout.
âIndira Gandhi was underestimated by everyoneâby the Syndicate who chose her, by the opposition who dismissed her, and by foreign observers who saw only Nehruâs daughter. They all paid for their miscalculation.â â Ramachandra Guha