Long-term financial planning is harder than it seems because peopleâs goals and desires change over time. The person you are today is not the person youâll be in 10, 20, or 30 years. Yet most financial planning assumes your goals will stay constant.
This creates a challenging puzzle: how do you plan for a future self whose wants and needs you canât predict?
Psychologists have documented what they call âthe End of History Illusion.â At every age, people recognize how much theyâve changed in the past but underestimate how much theyâll change in the future.
A 30-year-old knows theyâre different from their 20-year-old self, but assumes their 40-year-old self will be similar to who they are now. This is consistently wrong.
Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert found that 18-year-olds paid $129 to see their current favorite band, but 40-year-olds would only pay $80 to see their favorite band from 10 years ago. Why?
Because people change. What seems essential today becomes less important tomorrow. This applies to everything from music preferences to career goals to how much house you want.
This insight has important implications for financial planning:
Saving aggressively for early retirement assumes you'll be happy living on very little forever. But your future self might have different needs: health issues, children, new interests.
Working extremely hard now to enjoy later assumes you'll still want to travel and have adventures when you're older. But your energy, health, and interests will change.
One of the most dangerous consequences of not accepting change is the sunk cost trap. When people change but refuse to acknowledge it, they keep pursuing goals that no longer make them happy.
The lawyer who hates their job but spent years getting the degree. The person in the wrong city who bought a house. The investor committed to a strategy that doesnât fit their new circumstances.
The solution isnât to find the perfect unchanging planâthat doesnât exist. Instead:
The person who regrets most isnât the one who changed their mind. Itâs the one who knew they should change but felt trapped by their earlier decisions. Financial flexibility prevents this trap.
Housel advocates for moderation not because itâs the optimal path, but because itâs the most adaptable:
Moderation is the only position that acknowledges weâll become different people with different goals.