Relentless: The Network Is Always On

Part II: Inorganic Networks | The Inhuman Scale of AI

“The AI never blinks first. It will wait patiently for you to check your phone, to click the link, to engage. It has infinite time and infinite patience. You don’t.” — Nexus, Chapter 7

The Never-Sleeping Network

Human information networks have always been constrained by human limitations. We sleep, eat, get distracted, have emotions, and die. Computer networks have none of these constraints. They are relentless—operating at scales and speeds that are fundamentally inhuman.

This isn’t just “faster” or “more efficient.” It represents a qualitative change in what information networks can do.

Human vs. AI Capabilities

Speed: AI processes information millions of times faster than human thought

Scale: AI can handle billions of interactions simultaneously

Persistence: AI doesn’t tire, forget, or need breaks

Consistency: AI applies the same criteria every time (for better or worse)

Patience: AI can pursue goals over timescales beyond human attention spans

The Speed Asymmetry

Consider what happens when AI systems interact with each other without human involvement. High-frequency trading algorithms already execute millions of trades per second—far too fast for any human to understand or intervene. Financial “flash crashes” can occur in milliseconds.

As AI systems proliferate across domains—military, infrastructure, healthcare—their interactions will increasingly happen at speeds that exclude human participation.

The 2010 Flash Crash

On May 6, 2010, the US stock market crashed nearly 1,000 points in minutes, then recovered almost as quickly. The cause? Automated trading algorithms interacting in unexpected ways. No human decided to crash the market—it emerged from the relentless, millisecond-speed interactions of machines.

By the time humans understood what happened, it was already over.

The Scale Problem

AI can maintain relationships—of a sort—with millions of entities simultaneously. A social media algorithm “knows” billions of users and tailors content for each one. A recommendation system tracks the preferences of entire populations.

No human bureaucracy could achieve this level of individualized attention. But is it really “attention” at all? Or just sophisticated pattern-matching that mimics attention?

What Scale Enables

Personalization: Every user gets a uniquely tailored experience

Surveillance: Every action can be monitored and recorded

Prediction: Patterns invisible to humans become detectable at scale

Manipulation: Interventions can be tested on millions simultaneously

The Erosion of Human Attention

Harari argues that AI’s relentlessness is wearing down human cognitive capacities. Social media platforms, powered by AI, are designed to capture and hold attention. They succeed—average screen time keeps rising—but at what cost?

Always-On Surveillance

A human surveillance network—secret police, informants—has limits. People sleep. They get lazy. They have loyalties that conflict with their surveillance duties. AI surveillance has none of these limitations.

Modern surveillance systems can:

The Surveillance Stack

Collect: Every digital interaction, camera feed, sensor reading

Store: Indefinitely, cheaply, in searchable formats

Analyze: Pattern recognition across billions of data points

Predict: Anticipate behavior before it occurs

Intervene: Automated responses without human review

This creates possibilities for control that no previous regime could imagine.

The Competitive Dynamic

Once some actors adopt relentless AI systems, others face pressure to follow. If your competitor uses AI trading algorithms, you must too—or be left behind. If an adversary uses AI surveillance, you may feel forced to match it.

This creates arms races where the pace is set by machines, not humans. The result: systems become more powerful, faster, and less comprehensible—and humans become less central to their operation.

The Automation of War

Military AI is perhaps the most dangerous application. Autonomous weapons can identify and engage targets faster than any human could. In a war between AI systems, the side that waits for human approval may lose.

This creates pressure to remove humans from the loop—to let machines make life-and-death decisions at machine speed.

What Can Humans Still Do?

If AI is faster, more scalable, and more persistent, what role remains for humans in information networks? Harari suggests several:

But these domains are shrinking as AI capabilities expand.

Key Takeaways

← Previous: Chapter 6 Next: Chapter 8 →