Eye-Opening Problem-Solving

Models 15-23

“The problem is not the problem. The problem is your attitude about the problem.” — Captain Jack Sparrow

Creative Thinking Tools

Problems are opportunities in disguise—but only if you have the right mental frameworks to solve them. This chapter moves beyond analytical thinking into creative problem-solving territory. You’ll learn to separate correlation from causation, break down complex problems to first principles, and discover the power of “inversion thinking” where you define success by avoiding failure.

These nine mental models include some of the most powerful creative thinking tools ever developed: the Fishbone Diagram for root cause analysis, SCAMPER for innovation, and first principles thinking that allowed Elon Musk to revolutionize industries that had been stuck for decades.

Model 15: Correlation vs. Causation

Model 15

Core Principle: Separate correlation from causation using the Five Whys to understand root causes.

Just because two things happen together doesn’t mean one caused the other. This sounds obvious, yet correlation-causation confusion is one of the most common thinking errors.

Examples of Correlation Without Causation

The Five Whys Technique

To find root causes, ask “Why?” five times:

Problem: Sales dropped this quarter

  1. Why? → Marketing leads decreased
  2. Why? → Website traffic is down
  3. Why? → We stopped publishing weekly content
  4. Why? → Our content creator left
  5. Why? → We don’t have a succession plan or documented processes

Root cause: Lack of process documentation and succession planning (not just “sales are down”)

By asking “Why?” repeatedly, you move from symptoms to root causes. This prevents you from treating surface-level issues while the real problem persists.

Model 16: The Fishbone Diagram

Model 16

Core Principle: Tell the story in reverse using a fishbone diagram to visualize micro and macro factors leading to an effect.

The Fishbone Diagram (also called Ishikawa Diagram) is a visual tool for root cause analysis. You start with the effect—the problem or outcome—then work backward to identify all contributing causes.

How to Build a Fishbone Diagram

  1. Draw the “fish”: A horizontal arrow pointing to your effect (the problem)
  2. Add major “bones”: Categories of potential causes (typically: People, Process, Equipment, Materials, Environment, Management)
  3. Add sub-causes: For each major bone, identify specific contributing factors
  4. Analyze: Look for causes that appear multiple times or seem most significant

Example Application

Effect: Customer complaints increased 40%

Major causes identified:

The diagram reveals that the root cause isn’t just “bad customer service”—it’s a systemic issue across training, processes, product quality, and management oversight.

When to Use It

Use fishbone diagrams when:

Model 17: The SCAMPER Method

Model 17

Core Principle: Use seven creative thinking strategies to generate innovative ideas and solutions.

SCAMPER is a structured approach to creative thinking developed by Bob Eberle. Each letter represents a question that prompts creative solutions:

The SCAMPER Framework

S - Substitute: What can you replace?

C - Combine: What can you merge or integrate?

A - Adapt: What can you adjust or modify?

M - Modify/Magnify/Minify: What can you change in size, shape, or emphasis?

P - Put to Another Use: How else can you use this?

E - Eliminate: What can you remove?

R - Reverse/Rearrange: What can you flip or reorganize?

SCAMPER in Action

Problem: Your morning routine takes too long

Go through all seven prompts systematically, even if some seem irrelevant. Often the best ideas come from unexpected combinations.

Model 18: First Principles Thinking

Model 18

Core Principle: Break down problems to their most basic elements by questioning all assumptions.

First principles thinking means reasoning from fundamental truths rather than by analogy. Instead of saying “We do it this way because that’s how it’s always been done,” you ask: “What are the fundamental truths? What must be true? What can we build from there?”

Elon Musk’s Battery Example

Conventional thinking: “Battery packs cost $600/kWh. They’ll always be expensive.”

First principles thinking:

Result: Tesla drove battery costs down to ~$100/kWh, enabling affordable electric vehicles.

The Process

  1. Identify your assumptions: What are you taking for granted?
  2. Break them down: Challenge each assumption. Is it actually true? Why?
  3. Rebuild from fundamentals: What do you know for certain? What can you construct from those truths?

This is harder than reasoning by analogy, but it’s how breakthrough innovations happen. When everyone else is making incremental improvements, first principles thinking lets you leapfrog to entirely new solutions.

Model 19: Invert Your Thinking

Model 19

Core Principle: Rather than defining success, define and avoid failure. Identify what causes unhappiness instead of chasing happiness.

Mathematician Carl Jacobi famously said “Invert, always invert.” Instead of asking “How do I succeed?”, ask “What would guarantee failure?” Then avoid those things.

Why Inversion Works

Direct thinking: “How do I have a successful marriage?”

Inverted thinking: “What destroys marriages?”

Avoiding failure paths is often clearer and more actionable than pursuing success paths.

Applications Across Domains

Business: Instead of “How do we succeed?”, ask “What would bankrupt us?” (running out of cash, losing key customers, regulatory violations)

Health: Instead of “How do I get fit?”, ask “What ruins health?” (sedentary lifestyle, poor sleep, chronic stress, processed foods)

Learning: Instead of “How do I learn faster?”, ask “What prevents learning?” (multitasking, passive consumption, no practice, no testing)

Then systematically remove or avoid the failure modes.

Model 20: Avoid Thinking Like an Expert

Model 20

Core Principle: Experts overlook details that novices notice. Beginner’s mind sees fresh solutions.

Expertise is valuable, but it comes with a cost: experts develop blindspots. They:

The Beginner’s Advantage

Novices ask “dumb questions” that reveal unstated assumptions:

These questions often expose inefficiencies that experts stopped noticing years ago.

How to Cultivate Beginner’s Mind

  1. Question the obvious: Ask “why?” about things everyone takes for granted
  2. Explain to outsiders: Teaching forces you to see gaps in logic
  3. Seek diverse perspectives: People from other fields see your domain differently
  4. Periodically reset: Imagine you’re encountering your field/problem for the first time
  5. Welcome “naive” questions: They often reveal hidden complexity

The goal isn’t to abandon expertise—it’s to balance expert knowledge with beginner’s curiosity.

Model 21: Stay in Your Genius Zone

Model 21

Core Principle: Focus on natural strengths rather than expecting to excel in areas without inherent advantage.

You can improve at anything with practice, but you can’t will yourself into genius in areas where you lack natural aptitude. The highest achievers focus relentlessly on their “genius zones”—areas where natural talent meets acquired skill and deep interest.

The Four Zones

  1. Incompetence Zone: You’re bad at it and don’t enjoy it (delegate or eliminate)
  2. Competence Zone: You can do it but it drains you (minimize or outsource)
  3. Excellence Zone: You’re good at it but it’s effortful (do when necessary)
  4. Genius Zone: You’re naturally talented, enjoy it, and can achieve exceptional results (spend 80% of time here)

Most people spend too much time trying to fix weaknesses (moving from incompetence to competence) instead of leveraging strengths (maximizing genius zone activities).

Implementation Strategy

Audit your time:

Shift allocation:

This isn’t about being lazy in weak areas—it’s about strategic resource allocation. Your competitive advantage comes from excellence in your strengths, not adequacy in your weaknesses.

Model 22: The Anti-To-Do List

Model 22

Core Principle: Create “Don’t-Do” lists to eliminate low-value activities and reduce stress.

Everyone has to-do lists. Few people maintain “don’t-do lists”—explicit commitments to NOT doing certain things. Yet what you don’t do is often more important than what you do.

The Power of Subtraction

Adding another productivity hack, tool, or commitment rarely solves your problems. Removing low-value activities creates space for what matters.

A “Don’t-Do List” is a list of activities, habits, or commitments you consciously choose to eliminate or avoid.

Building Your Don’t-Do List

Category 1: Time Wasters

Category 2: Energy Drains

Category 3: Opportunity Costs

Review your calendar and commitments. What can you move to your Don’t-Do list? Each thing you stop doing creates time and energy for things that matter.

Model 23: Parkinson’s Law of Trivialities

Model 23

Core Principle: People give disproportionate time to trivial matters while neglecting truly important work.

Also called the “Bikeshed Effect,” this law observes that organizations spend more time debating trivial decisions (like what color to paint the bikeshed) than important ones (like approving the nuclear reactor design).

Why This Happens

Trivial decisions feel productive because:

Important decisions get less attention because:

Real-World Examples

Defense Against Triviality

Before spending time on a decision, ask:

  1. What’s the actual impact of this decision in 1 year?
  2. Am I avoiding a harder, more important problem?
  3. How much time should this decision rationally deserve?
  4. Am I confusing activity with progress?

Time-boxing trivial decisions:

The goal is to allocate attention proportional to importance—spend your thinking on what matters.

Key Takeaways

← Previous: Chapter 2 Next: Chapter 4 →