âThe way to get things done is to stimulate competition. Not in a sordid, money-getting way, but in the desire to excel.â â Dale Carnegie
Human beings are deeply competitiveânot only for material rewards, but for the feeling of mastery, of surpassing a challenge, of proving capability. This desire to excel is one of the most powerful motivational forces available to any leader, teacher, or persuader.
Carnegieâs twenty-first principle is about harnessing this drive. When you have exhausted incentives and explanations and have not produced the results you need, try stimulating the desire to meet a challenge. Not a threatâa challenge. Not âdo this or elseâââcan you do this? I wonder if you can.â
The distinction is everything. A threat activates fear and resentment. A challenge activates ambition and pride.
Carnegie returns to Charles Schwab, the steel magnate who paid a million dollars a year for his ability to deal with people. One of Schwabâs mills was persistently underperforming. The manager had tried everything: lectures, incentives, warnings. Nothing produced lasting improvement. Schwab came to visit.
âHow many heats did you make today?â he asked the outgoing day shift manager. âSix,â the manager said. Without a word, Schwab picked up a piece of chalk, wrote â6â in large numbers on the floor, and walked away. When the night crew came in and asked what the â6â meant, a day shift worker explained. The night crew decided to beat it. They made seven. The next morning, the day shift saw the â7â and decided they could do better than that.
Within a few days, the mill had gone from the worst-performing in the company to among the best. Schwab had done nothing except issue a silent challenge: beat that number. The desire to excel did the rest.
An effective challenge has these qualities:
Carnegie draws on Frederick Winslow Taylor and the psychology of work motivation to argue that most people are not motivated primarily by money. They are motivated by the chance to excelâby the game element in their work. The feeling of meeting a challenge, of surpassing yesterdayâs performance, of proving somethingâthis is more sustaining than any financial incentive.
This is why people play games for hours without pay. It is why athletes train for years toward a single competition. The competition activates something deepâthe desire to find out what youâre capable of.
A teacher who struggled with an unmotivated class tried a different approach. Instead of assigning homework with grades as the incentive, she issued a challenge: âI donât think this class can solve all five of these problems in class time. Iâve never had a class do it. You may surprise me.â The class worked with an energy she had never seen.
She had done nothing except activate their desire to prove something. The homework was identical. The grade incentive was identical. But the challengeâthe possibility of doing something nobody had done beforeâchanged everything.
Carnegie is not suggesting that you lead primarily through challenges. Most of the time, the earlier principlesâgenuine appreciation, interest in others, listening, working with what people wantâare more appropriate and effective. The challenge is a specific tool for specific situations.
Deploy a challenge when:
The critical requirement: the challenge must be genuine, not manipulative. If you say âI donât think you can do thisâ when you actually believe they can, people sense it. The challenge only works when it reflects honest uncertainty about a genuinely difficult goal.
Think of one person in your lifeâat work, at home, in your communityâwho is underperforming their potential:
Try it. Issue the challenge genuinely, step back, and observe.
Think of a time when someone challenged you to do something you werenât sure you could do. Not threatened youâchallenged you. What did it feel like? What did you do? How does that experience inform how you might motivate others?