âBy fighting you never get enough, but by yielding you get more than you expected.â â Dale Carnegie
Carnegie opens this chapter with a delightful story. He was taking his dog for an off-leash walk in a park where dogs were required to be on a leash. A police officer came by and warned him about it. Carnegie thanked him and let him go. A few days later, he was in the same park with his dog off-leash againâand he saw the same police officer coming. Before the officer could say a word, Carnegie walked over and said:
âOfficer, Iâm guilty. I have no excuses. I deserve to be fined. I was here the other day when you warned me about this, and Iâm doing it again. I know I should have the dog on a leash.â
The officer stared at him for a moment. Then he said: âWell, nobody gets hurt out here. Keep him out of the meadow where the rabbits are.â And he walked away.
By saying all the critical things the officer was going to say before he could say themâby beating the criticism to the punchâCarnegie disarmed the confrontation entirely. There was nothing left for the officer to criticize. He had to take the generous position.
When you admit a mistake before someone else points it out, something psychological happens. The person who was about to criticize you suddenly becomes your defender. The energy that would have gone into accusation redirects into reassurance.
This works because criticism, at its heart, is a bid for acknowledgment. When someone is about to criticize you, they want you to recognize that you have done something wrong. If you do that firstâcompletely and sincerelyâyou have given them what they want before they had to fight for it. And now they feel magnanimous.
When you admit you were wrong quickly and emphatically:
Carnegie invokes the example of General Robert E. Lee following the disastrous Pickettâs Charge at Gettysburg, where Lee had ordered an assault across open ground that resulted in catastrophic Union fire and enormous Confederate casualties. When the survivors came back broken and bleeding, Lee rode out to meet them.
âAll this has been my fault,â he told his men. âIt is I who have lost this fight.â He accepted complete, unconditional responsibility. There was no hedging, no attributing the failure to Pickettâs execution, no blaming circumstances. This admissionâmade in the immediate aftermath of one of the worst defeats of the warâcemented his soldiersâ loyalty and devotion to him more firmly than any victory could have.
People do not love leaders who are never wrong. They love leaders who take responsibility without defensiveness when things go wrong.
Carnegie notes that it requires character and self-control to admit we are wrong. Most people find it difficult for two reasons:
But Carnegie argues that the opposite is almost universally true. Admitting mistakes quickly and emphatically almost always reduces consequences and increases respect. The cover-up, the defense, the deflectionâthese are what turn mistakes into crises.
Carnegie suggests that when you know you have made a mistake, the most effective strategy is to criticize yourself more harshly than anyone else would. Say every critical thing about your mistake that anyone else could sayâand say it first. This leaves no ammunition for others. There is nothing left to attack because you have attacked yourself more thoroughly than they could.
When you know youâre wrong:
The difference between effective and ineffective apology is often the difference between âI was completely wrong about this, and hereâs what I should have doneâ and âWell, I may have perhaps not handled this perfectly given the circumstances.â
In the next week, identify one situation where you know you made a mistake or fell short:
Is there a mistake you made recently that you have been avoiding acknowledgingâhoping it would blow over or that no one would bring it up? What would happen if you admitted it preemptively, completely, and without defensiveness? What are you afraid of, and is that fear proportionate to the likely reality?