Don't Criticize, Condemn, or Complain

Part 1: Fundamental Techniques in Handling People — Principle 1

“Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain—and most fools do. But it takes character and self-control to be understanding and forgiving.” — Dale Carnegie

The Futility of Criticism

On May 7, 1931, a notorious criminal named “Two Gun” Crowley was cornered by police in a New York apartment after killing an officer. After a bloody siege, Crowley was captured. He became one of the most dangerous criminals in New York history. What did he say about himself? Crowley wrote a letter in his own blood: “Under my coat is a weary heart, but a kind one—one that would do nobody any harm.”

This is the core of Carnegie’s first principle. Crowley didn’t blame himself for anything. He considered himself a kind man being persecuted by an unjust world. Almost no one who does terrible things believes they are doing terrible things. Al Capone called himself “a public benefactor.” Dutch Schultz, another notorious gangster, described himself as a patriot. The history of human self-justification is long and consistent.

The Psychology of Self-Justification

Carnegie draws on psychology that was radical in 1936 and has since been confirmed by decades of research: criticism almost never produces lasting behavioral change. When you criticize someone, you attack their sense of self. Their immediate response—almost universally—is to defend themselves and counterattack. The criticized person becomes focused on justifying themselves, not on improving.

Think of the last time someone criticized you sharply. Did you think, “My goodness, how right they are—I should change immediately”? Or did you feel hurt, angry, and defensive? Most people feel the latter. Even when the criticism is entirely correct, the emotional wound it creates overshadows any rational acknowledgment of the truth.

Understanding Over Condemning

Abraham Lincoln learned this lesson the hard way. As a young man, he wrote anonymous letters mocking political opponents—letters so vicious that one target nearly challenged him to a duel. After that near-disaster, Lincoln stopped publicly criticizing people for life. During the Civil War, when generals failed him repeatedly, he said almost nothing critical—at least not to the generals themselves.

Lincoln’s Letter That Was Never Sent

After the disastrous Battle of Gettysburg, General Meade failed to pursue and destroy Lee’s army, potentially prolonging the war by years. Lincoln was furious. He sat down and wrote Meade a scathing letter detailing exactly how the general had failed. Then Lincoln did something remarkable: he never sent it. The letter was found among his papers after his death, never mailed.

Lincoln had learned that criticism, however justified, rarely achieves its purpose. Meade would have been stung and defensive. He would have explained his reasons. The relationship would have been poisoned. The criticism would not have changed the past. What would it accomplish?

The Human Need for Importance

Carnegie argues that the root cause of most bad behavior—and the key to most good behavior—is a profound human need to feel important and valued. When we criticize, we attack that need. When we understand and appreciate, we fulfill it.

The famous psychologist B.F. Skinner demonstrated with rats and pigeons that positive reinforcement creates far more lasting behavior change than punishment. The same principle applies to humans. Rather than criticizing people for what they’ve done wrong, try to understand what drove them. What were they trying to achieve? What pressures were they under? What did they want?

Instead of Criticism, Try Understanding

Before criticizing anyone, pause and ask yourself:

This mental exercise does not mean excusing bad behavior. It means approaching people as complex human beings rather than objects to be managed. And this shift in perspective—from judgment to understanding—changes everything about how you interact with them.

The Three C’s to Avoid

Carnegie’s principle is often summarized as avoiding the “Three C’s”: Criticize, Condemn, and Complain. Each of these behaviors has specific problems.

Criticizing creates defensiveness and resentment. Even when the criticism is valid, the person being criticized usually focuses on their wounded pride rather than on improving.

Condemning goes further—it writes the person off as bad, stupid, or worthless. Condemnation destroys motivation and leaves the person feeling hopeless rather than inspired to change.

Complaining is perhaps the subtlest poison. Constant complaint signals that you see others as problems to be managed rather than people to be respected. It drains energy from everyone around you and never produces constructive change.

The Alternative

The alternative to the Three C’s is not silence or passivity. It is:

This approach is not weakness. It takes far more self-discipline to restrain criticism and seek understanding than to simply vent your frustration. Carnegie is asking you to develop what he calls “character and self-control”—the qualities that distinguish great leaders and beloved friends from ordinary people.

A Daily Practice

The practical application of this principle begins with one simple habit: before you criticize, wait. Give yourself twenty-four hours. In many cases, you’ll find that the situation that seemed to demand criticism has resolved itself, or that your perspective has shifted enough to find a better approach.

Daily Practice: The 24-Hour Rule

When you feel the urge to criticize someone:

  1. Wait twenty-four hours before saying anything
  2. During that time, ask yourself what you hope to achieve with the criticism
  3. Think about three things the person has done right recently
  4. Consider whether a question might work better than a statement
  5. If you still need to address the issue, do so by asking rather than telling

Reflection

Think of someone in your life you have criticized recently. What was the result? Did your criticism change their behavior, or did it primarily create defensiveness and distance? What might have happened if you had tried to understand their perspective first?

Key Takeaways

← Back to Overview Next: Chapter 2 →