âEgo clouds and disrupts everything: the planning process, the ability to take good advice, and the ability to accept constructive criticism.â â Jocko Willink
This chapter examines how ego â perhaps the most insidious enemy a leader faces â can undermine even the most capable teams. In the high-stakes environment of Ramadi, where split-second decisions meant the difference between life and death, ego had the potential to be catastrophic.
Leif Babin describes a situation in Ramadi where tensions escalated between SEAL operators and conventional U.S. Army units. The SEALs, elite special operators with a strong sense of pride in their capabilities, sometimes clashed with Army soldiers who had different tactics, procedures, and cultures. Some SEALs looked down on conventional forces. Some Army personnel resented the SEALsâ perceived arrogance.
During one operation, this friction nearly led to disaster. A SEAL element and an Army unit operating in the same sector had conflicting plans. Rather than coordinating and deferring to the overall mission commander, ego drove both groups to insist on their approach. The lack of coordination created dangerous gaps in coverage and nearly resulted in another friendly fire incident.
Leif had to step in and check the ego of his own SEALs. He reminded them that the mission was bigger than their pride. The Army soldiers were allies, not competitors. The enemy was on the other side of the gun, not in the adjacent building clearing rooms. Once egos were checked, the two units began coordinating effectively and accomplishing far more together than either could alone.
Ego is the most dangerous quality in a leader because it is so difficult to detect in yourself. Ego tells you that you are always right, that you donât need advice, that your way is the best way, and that anyone who disagrees is wrong or incompetent. Ego prevents learning, destroys collaboration, and ultimately leads to failure.
Checking your ego does not mean becoming passive or lacking confidence. The best leaders possess a paradoxical combination of confidence and humility. They are confident in their ability to lead, make decisions, and drive results. But they are humble enough to recognize that they donât have all the answers, that others may have better ideas, and that they are always capable of improving.
This balance is sometimes called âconfident humility.â It allows a leader to:
Jocko and Leif describe a CEO who had built a successful technology company from scratch. His intelligence and drive had been essential in the early days. But as the company grew, his ego became a liability. He dismissed ideas from his leadership team because he believed he knew better than everyone else. He micromanaged departments, undermining the authority of his vice presidents. He refused to acknowledge when strategies werenât working because admitting failure felt like personal weakness.
The companyâs growth stalled. Top talent began leaving because they felt unvalued and unheard. The board grew concerned. When Echelon Front was brought in, the diagnosis was clear: the CEOâs ego was choking the organization.
The breakthrough came when the CEO was challenged to apply Extreme Ownership to his ego. He realized that his refusal to listen wasnât strength â it was weakness. His inability to share credit wasnât confidence â it was insecurity. His micromanagement wasnât thoroughness â it was a lack of trust born from ego.
Once he began checking his ego â actively soliciting input, giving credit to others, admitting when he was wrong â the entire organization transformed. Innovation returned because people felt safe proposing ideas. Retention improved because people felt valued. Growth resumed because the best ideas, regardless of their source, could now surface and be implemented.
Ego and Extreme Ownership are fundamentally incompatible. You cannot take ownership of your failures if your ego will not allow you to admit them. You cannot learn from mistakes if your ego tells you that you donât make any. You cannot build a high-performing team if your ego demands that you be the star.
The most effective leaders in both combat and business share a common trait: they subordinate their personal ego to the mission and the team. They donât need to be the smartest person in the room. They donât need credit for every success. They donât need to win every argument. What they need is for the mission to succeed and for their people to grow. When the leaderâs ego is removed from the equation, the team can focus entirely on what matters: accomplishing the mission.